Gait variability is a critical functional indicator of dynamic balance and neurocognitive decline in health. Its translation into clinical practice is, however, challenged by a lack of age-related normative trajectories and reference values under real-world ecological settings. Furthermore, the conventional metrics used to estimate gait variability (Coefficient of Variation, CV; Standard Deviation, SD) have a fundamental methodological flaw: the inherent sensitivity of conventional metrics to the statistical outliers and environmental noise in real-world walking. In this study, we mitigate this factor by applying a robust statistical framework to quantify gait variability. Analysing a large-scale cohort of community-dwelling older adults (n=2,193), we first demonstrate that free-living gait data follows a heavy-tailed distribution, necessitating the use of robust estimators like the Robust Coefficient of Variation (RCV-MAD) and Median Absolute Deviation (MAD). Leveraging these metrics, we established the normative trajectory and reference values of real-world gait variability across the ageing lifespan, revealing a distinct, age-dependent increase in spatio-temporal fluctuations, indicating a decline in rhythmicity and steadiness with age. We further demonstrated the clinical utility of these robust metrics: RCV-MAD consistently yielded larger effect sizes than conventional CV in discriminating between fallers and non-fallers across all gait parameters. Furthermore, we illustrate the potential of long-term unsupervised monitoring to capture intrinsic variability during real-world walking. Validated for consistency and reliability, this robust framework provides the necessary ecological validity to transform gait variability into a standardised, rapid clinical metric for assessing functional decline at an early timepoint.
Walking in the Free World: Establishing Normative Trajectories for Ecological Assessment of Robust Gait Variability with Age
TL;DR
Gait variability is a critical functional indicator of dynamic balance and neurocognitive decline in health. Its translation into clinical practice is, however, challenged by a lack of age-related normative trajectories and reference values under real-world ecological settings. Furthermore, the conventional metrics used to estimate gait variability (Coefficient of Variation, CV; Standard Deviation, SD) have a fundamental methodological flaw: the inherent sensitivity of conventional metrics to th
Credibility Assessment
Preliminary — 34/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
4/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
12/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
34/100
0 Comments
Log in to join the discussion.