Telomeres are key biomarkers of cellular ageing, yet their dynamics remain poorly studied in tropical and short-lived bat species. Here, we present the first investigation of telomere length across age in Molossus molossus, a tropical bat historically categorised as the shortest-lived bat on record. Through a multi-year mark-recapture study in Gamboa, Panama, we sampled 492 individuals (n = 317 females, 175 males) and documented a female M. molossus surviving to at least 13 years of age, more than doubling the previously reported maximum lifespan of 5.6 years. Across the population, relative telomere length (rTL) showed no overall significant decline with age. No evidence was found for sex-specific rates of telomere attrition. Rather these results suggest that males and females follow parallel age-related telomere trajectories, with any sex differences primarily reflecting differences in mean telomere length rather than ageing dynamics. Overall, the findings here challenge previous assumptions about the lifespan and ageing biology of M. molossus. They demonstrate that telomere maintenance is not limited to temperate bats, show that sex differences in telomere biology are subtle and species-specific, and reinforce the value of long-term field studies for understanding ageing processes in the wild.
Defying expectations: Extended lifespan and limited age-related telomere shortening in the tropical bat species, Molossus molossus.
TL;DR
Telomeres are key biomarkers of cellular ageing, yet their dynamics remain poorly studied in tropical and short-lived bat species. Here, we present the first investigation of telomere length across age in Molossus molossus, a tropical bat historically categorised as the shortest-lived bat on record. Through a multi-year mark-recapture study in Gamboa, Panama, we sampled 492 individuals (n = 317 females, 175 males) and documented a female M. molossus surviving to at least 13 years of age, more th
Credibility Assessment
Preliminary — 34/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
4/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
12/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
34/100
0 Comments
Log in to join the discussion.