Males and females are known to have dramatically different health and lifespan trajectories, but the underlying basis for these differences is yet to be fully elucidated. In the Caenorhabditis elegans nematode model system, most aging studies have been conducted with hermaphrodites, and little is known about male-specific responses to pro-longevity mutations. Several previous studies have used the auxin-inducible degron system to degrade the DAF-2/IGF-1 receptor in hermaphrodites, finding that both ubiquitous and tissue-specific degradation can extend lifespan. Here we show that ubiquitous degradation of DAF-2 in male C. elegans increases median lifespan by more than 440%, one of the longest lifespan extensions by a single intervention to date. Conversely, degrading DAF-2 in the male germline decreased lifespan, opposite of its effect in hermaphrodites. Using male mating and reproductive success as a meaningful ecological and neurophysiological measure of healthspan, we found that ubiquitous degradation of DAF-2 greatly prolongs reproductive health, likely by prolonging function of the male intromittent organ in the tail. This work provides further evidence for the importance of studying sex differences in aging and highlights the utility of using C. elegans males to understand the underlying basis of enhanced lifespan and healthspan.
Disruption of the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans dramatically increases male longevity and enhances reproductive health late in life.
TL;DR
Males and females are known to have dramatically different health and lifespan trajectories, but the underlying basis for these differences is yet to be fully elucidated. In the Caenorhabditis elegans nematode model system, most aging studies have been conducted with hermaphrodites, and little is known about male-specific responses to pro-longevity mutations. Several previous studies have used the auxin-inducible degron system to degrade the DAF-2/IGF-1 receptor in hermaphrodites, finding that b
Credibility Assessment
Preliminary — 44/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
16/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
10/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
44/100
0 Comments
Log in to join the discussion.