This study explored the effect of the combined treatment with Composite Preservative and Modified Atmosphere Packaging (EC + MAP) on the storage quality of fresh-cut pineapple stored at 4 °C with 85% humidity for 8 days. Non-targeted metabolomics was used to uncover the metabolic mechanisms behind shelf-life extension. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotation identified 110 metabolites across eight categories. After 8 days, the untreated control had 53 significantly changed metabolites (46 upregulated, 7 downregulated) compared to day 0, with key ones like 4-aminobutyric acid and D-ribose. The EC + MAP treatment led to 75 significant metabolite changes (18 upregulated, 57 downregulated) versus the control, with notable differences in lactulose and L-threonine. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed distinct metabolic profile shifts (R2X = 0.596 between day 0 and day 8 for controls; R2X = 0.717 between controls and EC + MAP at day 8). Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) confirmed groupings and identified differential metabolites with VIP > 1 and P < 0.05. Key pathways regulated by EC + MAP, including alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism, C5-branched dibasic acid metabolism, and the TCA cycle, suggest it extends shelf life by inhibiting the accumulation of metabolites related to amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism.
Untargeted metabolomic profiling of pineapple storage quality: insights from combined preservative and modified atmosphere packaging treatments.
TL;DR
This study explored the effect of the combined treatment with Composite Preservative and Modified Atmosphere Packaging (EC + MAP) on the storage quality of fresh-cut pineapple stored at 4 °C with 85% humidity for 8 days. Non-targeted metabolomics was used to uncover the metabolic mechanisms behind shelf-life extension. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotation identified 110 metabolites across eight categories. After 8 days, the untreated control had 53 significantly changed meta
Credibility Assessment
Preliminary — 38/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
10/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
10/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
38/100
0 Comments
Log in to join the discussion.