Outlive
LongevityResearchHub

Enhancing Healthy Longevity: A Scoping Review of Practices and Interventions.

TL;DR

BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, concerns have arisen about the distinction between health span and lifespan, highlighting that longevity does not necessarily equate to good health, a concept often referred to as "healthy longevity." While various strategies have been explored to promote healthy aging and achieve healthy longevity, it remains uncertain which practices are most effective. OBJECTIVE: To identify the existing and emerging practices and interventions that promote healthy longe

Credibility Assessment Preliminary — 38/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
10/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
10/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
38/100

BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, concerns have arisen about the distinction between health span and lifespan, highlighting that longevity does not necessarily equate to good health, a concept often referred to as "healthy longevity." While various strategies have been explored to promote healthy aging and achieve healthy longevity, it remains uncertain which practices are most effective.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the existing and emerging practices and interventions that promote healthy longevity, identify the key components of these practices and interventions, and to consider how stakeholders contribute to these practices and interventions.
METHODS: Design: A scoping review of literature Methods: Arksey & O'malley's six-stage framework was used to conduct and guide reporting. The Joanna Briggs Institute Population-Concept-Context framework was used to define eligibility criteria and select studies that report practices/interventions aimed at achieving long health span or promoting healthy longevity carried out in community. Data were manually extracted by two independent reviewers to detail the characteristics of these practices and interventions, guide the data charting process and narrative synthesis. Data Sources: Six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) were searched for academic papers published between January 2010 and February 2025.
RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies, mostly published after 2020, were predominantly conducted in high income settings (81.0%) across North America, Europe, and Asia. Four study types were identified: interventional (33%), intervention development (19%), association (24%), and descriptive (24%). Interventional. Intervention development studies primarily described multi component programmes targeting individual and social determinants of health and generally reported beneficial effects on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes. Association studies linked micro , meso , and macro level factors (e.g. nutrition, household expenditure, housing quality, health insurance, public financing policy) to healthy longevity indicators. Descriptive studies highlighted themes cross micro and meso level, such as finance, physical activity, mental and spiritual health, digital literacy, independent living, safety, social support, and healthcare support.
CONCLUSIONS: The identified community-based strategies, practices, and policies which extend health span represent the joint effort of multiple stakeholders and disciplines. The implementation of these practices and policies are worthy to be supported. More studies in diverse socioeconomic contexts are needed.

View Original Source

0 Comments