Across animal taxa, females commonly mate with more than one male, even in monogamous mating systems. These extra-pair (EP) copulations and resulting young may increase the fitness of the female via a variety of mechanisms. The "good genes" hypothesis suggests that socially monogamous females mate outside their pair bond to increase the fitness of their offspring via indirect genetic benefits, because extra-pair males do not provide parental care. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying extra-pair paternity in nonmigratory, food-caching mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). Chickadees rely on spatial cognition to recover scattered food caches and variation in spatial cognition is associated with increased survival, longer lifespan, and is heritable. However, less is known about the role of sexual selection on spatial cognitive abilities. In the current study, we found that 1. males with better spatial cognitive abilities sired more extra-pair young and produce heavier offspring in their own nests compared to their poorer performing counterparts, and 2. extra-pair males had significantly better spatial cognition than the social males they cuckolded. These results suggest that sexual selection shapes the evolution of spatial cognition in food-caching chickadees and are consistent with the good genes hypothesis, which posits that females gain indirect genetic benefits via extra-pair young.
Seeking smarts: Male chickadees with better spatial cognition sire more extra-pair young
TL;DR
Across animal taxa, females commonly mate with more than one male, even in monogamous mating systems. These extra-pair (EP) copulations and resulting young may increase the fitness of the female via a variety of mechanisms. The "good genes" hypothesis suggests that socially monogamous females mate outside their pair bond to increase the fitness of their offspring via indirect genetic benefits, because extra-pair males do not provide parental care. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying extra-p
Credibility Assessment
Preliminary — 39/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
4/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
17/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
39/100
0 Comments
Log in to join the discussion.