Aging of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) impairs regenerative capacity and predisposes to hematological diseases. Here, we constructed a comprehensive single-cell transcriptomic atlas comprising 186,123 CD34+ HSPCs spanning early prenatal development (6 post-conception weeks) to late adulthood (74 years). We identified six molecular programs (MPs) that define distinct functional states within the HSC/multipotent progenitor (MPP) compartment. Among these, MP1, associated with inflammaging, and MP5, related to RNA splicing and protein homeostasis, exhibited conserved age-associated dynamics across independent datasets, highlighting their central roles in stem cell aging. Leveraging these age-associated programs, we developed a machine learning-based stem cell aging clock from 84 donors to predict chronological age from HSC/MPP transcriptomes. Applying this aging clock to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) defines transcriptional age deviation (TAD), a measure of biological age divergence in leukemic HSC/MPPs. TAD captures disease-associated variation linked to genetic risk stratification and patient survival. Our study provides a high-resolution reference map of human HSPC aging, establishes a stem cell-specific aging clock and demonstrates its utility for uncovering aging-related dysregulation with prognostic relevance in hematological malignancies.
A single-cell atlas and aging clock define biological age and risk-associated stem cell states in human hematopoiesis
TL;DR
Aging of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) impairs regenerative capacity and predisposes to hematological diseases. Here, we constructed a comprehensive single-cell transcriptomic atlas comprising 186,123 CD34+ HSPCs spanning early prenatal development (6 post-conception weeks) to late adulthood (74 years). We identified six molecular programs (MPs) that define distinct functional states within the HSC/multipotent progenitor (MPP) compartment. Among these, MP1, associated with infl
Credibility Assessment
Preliminary — 34/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
4/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
12/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
34/100
0 Comments
Log in to join the discussion.