With the growing burden of age-related diseases, understanding and modulating the aging process has become a priority. Transcriptomic aging clocks (TACs) can track biological age but remain limited by platform dependence, tissue specificity, or restricted accessibility. To address this, we developed Pasta, a robust and broadly applicable human TAC, built using a novel 'age-shift' learning framework. Pasta accurately predicted relative age across diverse tissues and data types, including bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq as well as microarray data. Its predictions aligned with senescent and stem-like cellular states and relied on model coefficients enriched for p53 and DNA damage response pathways. Pasta's age scores correlated with tumor grade and patient survival in several cancer types, indicating potential clinical relevance. Applied to over three million transcriptomes from the Connectivity Map L1000 dataset, Pasta identified both established and previously unrecognized age-modulatory compounds and genetic perturbations, highlighting mitochondrial translation and mRNA splicing as key determinants of cellular propensity for aging and rejuvenation, respectively. Experimental validation confirmed pralatrexate as a potent senescence inducer and piperlongumine as a rejuvenating agent in human cells. Together, these findings establish Pasta as a versatile and accessible tool for aging research and therapeutic discovery.
Pasta, a Versatile Transcriptomic Clock, Maps the Chemical and Genetic Determinants of Aging and Rejuvenation.
TL;DR
With the growing burden of age-related diseases, understanding and modulating the aging process has become a priority. Transcriptomic aging clocks (TACs) can track biological age but remain limited by platform dependence, tissue specificity, or restricted accessibility. To address this, we developed Pasta, a robust and broadly applicable human TAC, built using a novel 'age-shift' learning framework. Pasta accurately predicted relative age across diverse tissues and data types, including bulk and
Credibility Assessment
Preliminary — 46/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
18/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
10/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
46/100
0 Comments
Log in to join the discussion.